Clients will pay high fees for good advice
I have just read a report in Accountancy Magazine about some research published by the UK 200 group*. The report notes that:
Clients are more likely to ditch their accountants for giving therm incorrect or poor advice than for being too expensive……Clients only rate high fees as the THIRD most important reason for switching accountants behind incorrect or poor advice (87%) and lack of personal contact (66%).
Two other key points noted in the short report:
Tax planning was rated as the most valued service;
Around 60% of respondents had been with their accountants for upwards of five years;
I’m always dubious about drawing conclusions from surveys and reports when there are no details as to how the data was collected or of how representative was the sample surveyed. So with that caveat what do I conclude from this brief report of the UK 200 group’s research?
1 – It seems to vindicate my view that more accountants could increase their fees without losing too many clients. Indeed, those most likely to leave are probably the D-list clients that you want to ditch anyway. Much depends on how you raise the subject and how you implement the fees increase of course.
2 – It reinforces the rationale for the formation of the Tax Advice Network – which enables accountants to access vetted, independent, cost effective and expert tax specialists. Accountants can use our specialists to provide second opinions and so avoid giving “incorrect or poor advice” and to enable them to provide an appropriate level of “tax planning” to clients.
3 – It confirms my view that clients will pay decent fees for good advice. When I ran the tax support for professionals team at a large tax consultancy I noted that accountants were reluctant to engage the firm and often said things like “My clients are used to only paying £300 a year. They’d never pay £2,000 for tax planning advice.” I’d be the first to accept that an accountant knows their clients best. Equally I have long felt that some accountants undervalue the advice they provide and make incorrect assumptions about the level of fees some clients would pay if the cost/benefit ratio made sense.
The UK 200 group’s survey suggests that many clients are more interested in getting the right advice than in paying low fees – especially when it comes to the provision of tax planning advice.
So my message today is to ensure that you charge appropriately for good valuable advice.
I’ve written about this before on this blog:
- Timesheets and value pricing professional services
- Detailed fee quotes and bills for professional work
- No reference to fees and plenty of free advice time?
*Strangely I can’t find any ref to the UK 200 group’s research online so cannot provide a link.
April 10, 2008 Posted by bookmarklee | Achieving success, Adding value, Pitching, Tax related | | 1 Comment
TAX ADVICE NETWORK
This blog is proudly sponsored by the Tax Advice NetworkWelcome
Mark Lee is a popular speaker and commentator on business generation for accountants. He is also Chairman of the Tax Advice Network, the UK's largest network of independent tax advisers. Mark is a past Chairman of the Chartered Accountants’ Tax Faculty and remains active within the Faculty.33253
Keep in touch - newsletters
Mark's other sites
Subscribe here
Key topics addressed
-
Blog Stats
- 64,338 hits
Follow Mark on twitter
- I'm copying and pasting dates from cells in one excel s/sheet to another file but dates chnage?! eg: 01/12/2007 becomes 02/12/2011. Why?? 2 hours ago
- Drafting an article: Sole practitioner accountants are animals (in the way they run their practice). What sort of animal are you like? 7 hours ago
- Sole practitioner animal types. So far I have cheetahs, workhorses, snakes, ostriches and wise old lions. More animal analogies please. 22 hours ago
-
Recent comments
-
Most recent items
The archives




